Following the Press Gazette’s excellent News on the Move conference last month, I’ve written a piece for the Guardian Media Network pulling out the key lessons shared on the day.
In short, what does the move to mobile mean for publishers of all stripes? These seven things at least:
1. Plan for the extended internet day – and week
2. Think format
3. Remember, the web still rules
4. Use apps to upsell
5. Don’t forget the role of social media
6. Viral hits don’t happen without mobile
7. It’s the content, stupid
I expand on each over at ‘From BBC to BuzzFeed: lessons in mobile publishing‘.
I’ve just published a piece at the Press Gazette which explores a significant milestone for the BBC and anyone else involved in the world of fast moving, content-rich websites. For the very first time more people visited the BBC online via mobile phones than via desktop and laptop PCs. It happened on Sunday 14 July. And then again on Saturday 20 July.
As I note in the piece this is merely an extreme case (for now) of a trend that has been apparent for a while:
The direction of travel is clear: more and more people are accessing news-based websites from mobile devices (tablets as well as smartphones) and we have plenty of evidence that this is the case.
In an effort to identify the meaning of this milestone, I suggest that it matters in three ways*:
- It should inform web design
- It may change newsroom shift patterns
- It may make you rethink your app strategy
Anyway, you can read the piece in full here: The BBC passes mobile landmark. And that matters why?
*It probably matters in more than three ways.
I wrote something grumpy for last week’s New Statesman about football, the BBC and pun-soaked platitudes. Here’s how it began:
In the early Noughties when broadcasters still bothered to find new uses for the interactive red button, the Beeb began offering viewers of live football three audio options – the TV commentary, the Radio 5 Live commentary or the sound of the crowd. Public service broadcasting at its best and, naturally, I chose the crowd.
Now that there’s no such choice, I press mute instead. Anything to escape the reverse alchemy that invariably results when middle- aged men with lip mics share commentating duties. Tell me I’m not alone.
It’s certainly not this column’s role to do anyone out of a job – especially in these recessionary times – but surely football-watching would remain undiminished if we did away with the odd commentator or co-commentator, sometimes laughably referred to as the “expert summariser”.
Where we crave insight and analysis, we get platitudes and pre-prepared, pun-soaked soliloquies to fill the dead air. (Really, what’s wrong with dead air?)
You can read the full thing here.
A new entry in Amazon’s Hot Future Releases in Business, Finance & Law.
In at number nine, and likely to rise and rise in the coming weeks, is Sir William Garrow: His Life, Times and Fight for Justice by John Hostettler and Richard Braby.
In other news, a BBC drama set in the 18th century and featuring the life, times and fight for justice of an idealistic young barrister began last night.
Garrow’s Law stars Andrew Buchan (he of ITV’s The Fixer and BBC4’s short-lived Party Animals) and is written by Tony Marchant (The Mark of Cain, Holding On etc).
As Buchan and Marchant take hold of Sunday evenings between now and Christmas, expect Hostettler and Braby’s book (not published until 1 December) to scale the pre-order charts.
Just like that upstart Twitter, the BBC has the power to shift units.
– As Print Dwindles, can Amazon Re-Kindle?
While much of the Nick Griffin / Question Time chat was happening on Twitter, some people went straight to the source to express their views.
The BBC reported 10,000 comments were left on the Have Your Say section of the corporation’s website (normal activity: a few hundred) while, by mid-morning today, 2,000 posts were viewable on a specially created message board.
The figures come via the Online Journalism Blog’s Paul Bradshaw who put a few questions to Matthew Eltringham from the BBC’s UGC Hub.
Eltringham notes that the Have Your Say numbers were recently matched in volume by responses to President Obama’s Nobel Prize win.
But in that instance the traffic was global in nature whereas last night it was a more parochial affair.
– BNP on Question Time: The BBC should be applauded
– Daily Mail Ends Moderation. Will Anybody Notice?
Ever since Andrew Marr put the medication question to Gordon Brown yesterday, the media has turned the spotlight on the political blogosphere.
Was Marr guilty of indulging in some web-based tittle-tattle, on the BBC no less? Had he fallen for another right-wing conspiracy in cyberspace? Or was the question of the PM’s state of mind a legitimate area for discussion?
Opinions are naturally divided – Charlie Beckett at Polis and Benedict Brogan writing on his Telegraph blog provide some of the more insightful analysis.
Meanwhile, the hunt was on for the blogger that had originally put the idea of the PM-on-pills into the public domain.
Some mistakenly thought it all started with Guido Fawkes, but the UK’s most renowned political blogger soon put them right.
The author of the original was in fact John Ward who blogs at Not Born Yesterday.
Earlier today, Ward told Channel 4 News:
The fact of the matter is I still have no more proof, and I stress proof, than anyone else that Gordon Brown is actually taking anti-depressants.
All I can say is that I was given a verbal list of foods he allegedly cannot have by a very senior civil servant at a social gathering. And as an occasional depressive myself in the past I recognised the contraindications immediately from many years ago to be those of an anti-depressant of the MAOI type that I have taken.
So no proof and a Downing Street denial, but an educated guess backed up by a verbal tip off from a “very senior civil servant”. It’s probably enough to legitimise it as a story out in the blogosphere.
But at the post-Gilligan BBC? I’m not so sure.
– Sorry Guido, the BBC did for Duncan
A couple of years ago the BBC revamped its news website so when a major story came along it could push aside all the detritus and devote the top of the page to a single story – larger headline font and bigger image.
It was an admission of sorts that template-driven websites were all very well but come a big event (think 7/7, 9/11, Blair’s resignation etc) there was a need to make a visual impact.
Implicit is the power of print. Despite the onward rush of digital, no where is a splash quite as effective than on the front page of a newspaper.
The Daily Telegraph’s coverage of the Lehman Brothers’ collapse last September is a vivid reminder of that. Appropriate then that one year on Google has unveiled Fast Flip, digital’s latest attempt to ape that power.
– News websites 1990s-style
– What’s Wrong With This Telegraph Front Page?
– The Express Fiddles While The Mail Earns